Flexicurity or Flexicarity? A Portuguese Overview

Article de journal

Auteurs / Editeurs

Domaines de Recherche

Détails sur la publication

Liste des auteurs: Vilela, N. B., Caramelo Gomes, J., Jesus-Silva, N.
Editeur: Lexonomica Press, University of Maribor
Année de publication: 2016
Journal: Lexonomica (1855-7155)
Numéro du volume: 8
Numéro de publication: 2
Page d'accueil: 125
Dernière page: 137
Nombre de pages: 13
ISSN: 1855-7155
Languages: Anglais-Royaume-Uni (EN-GB)


Due to the increasing competition on the labour market, the
search for new approaches to labour legislations led to the creation and
adoption, in some countries, of so called “flexicurity”. “Flexicurity”
became top of the list in the policy agenda in the European Union, but
there is doubt that such an agenda for encompassing labour market reform
providing not employment. As sources are used “flexicurity” models, in
countries where it has already been successfully implemented, as well as
Eurostat data, information made available by the European Commission,
as well as doctrinal and research papers. Portuguese jurisdiction is
considered by national legal doctrine as a closed model. Heavy regulation
and constitutional constraints drive an almost unanimous rejection of the
possibility to introduce the concept at national level. This article's goal is
to discuss the ways the concept could be introduced in the Portuguese
jurisdiction. Would the model effectively create security, or would it result
in precarity?


Pas d'articles correspondants trouvés.


Pas d'articles correspondants trouvés.

Dernière mise à jour le 2019-13-08 à 00:46